evie
Jake Fan
Posts: 449
|
Post by evie on Nov 13, 2011 19:09:59 GMT -5
There's no evidence that Jake and Kirsten broke upon bad terms. Neither has ever said that, and as far as I know, it's never been reported. Kirsten said in an interview a couple of years sgo that they aren't good friends, but that could be said for most exes. And we know they spent time together when they were both filming in Montreal. I don't think Kirsten takes care of Atticus, however. Also, Jake said during Source Code promotion that he is not and never has been on Twitter. They spent time together in Montreal? I read only one comment about that period, which was that the two of them ended up in the same restaurant at the same time and didn't speak. And I also read an account sometime after the final breakup with KD about how she and Jake had an unpleasant encounter at a Hollywood party they both happened to attend. I have no clue as to whether those stories can be trusted. From what the blogs and interviews reported at the time of their breakup, J&K did not separate on bad terms. Jake said very little about their split (initially he claimed KD would always be a part of his life), but Kirsten was a bit more forthcoming (as in she told an interviewer that they were too young to last as a couple, but she praised Jake's character). Some ex-partners can remain devoted friends ever after, and some cannot. I have the impression that Jake and Kirsten fall into the second group.
|
|
|
Post by Sasha4Jake on Nov 14, 2011 3:48:26 GMT -5
I have no clue as to how their break-up was, since I wasn't a fan back then. To me Jake makes the impression of being a very devoted partner (I just assume that, I don't know for sure). If you invest that many feelings in another person, even if you don't hate them, usually you can't stand to be around them once it's over. That has nothing to do with being on bad terms, you just don't want to have your wounds ripped open again and again.
Anyway, I only know this interview with Kirsten from September 2006:
I don't think Jake was all too pleased to read these kind of things being dragged into the public, so that might have changed his mind about her.
|
|
trekfan
Gyllenhaalic Wannabe
Posts: 522
|
Post by trekfan on Nov 14, 2011 11:15:33 GMT -5
There's no evidence that Jake and Kirsten broke upon bad terms. Neither has ever said that, and as far as I know, it's never been reported. Kirsten said in an interview a couple of years sgo that they aren't good friends, but that could be said for most exes. And we know they spent time together when they were both filming in Montreal. I don't think Kirsten takes care of Atticus, however. Also, Jake said during Source Code promotion that he is not and never has been on Twitter. I'm not sure if it was bad terms. The reason I said that is because I read something somewhere that gave me that impression. I don't think they communicate at all at this point. As to twitter, Jake could be on there under a different name. OR his people (agent, publicist) could keep tabs on what is being posted and let him know if there is anything he needs to know about (like that photo shopped photo that was all over the net a few months ago) I don't think Jake would let the public know about what he belongs to on the internet, it's nobodies business but his.
|
|
|
Post by Sasha4Jake on Nov 14, 2011 13:01:48 GMT -5
Yeah, good point, trekfan.
|
|
|
Post by jfaulkin on Nov 14, 2011 14:29:53 GMT -5
I knew that they dated and broke up but never knew why...and looks like there are diffenent points of view on that one. Thanks for the infor and them and the dogs.
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Nov 29, 2011 19:25:00 GMT -5
About the Kristen Durst general impression, reading some celebrities blogs, very very old, was about 2004, seems that Gyllenhaal and Dust have already a unbalenced relationship, beside the fact of evidence that both were deeply in love. I know that some fuss comes put about Atticus, as evie mentioned he was a disputed dog, so i find fairly considerable that both now aren't friends, me as well i never gave my friendship to any of exes, too painful... Also i wish to pointed about the sided effect of web and twitter and stuff like this, that i completely agree with Mermon and Sasha. Too easily people mobbing celebrities, hided behind a screen there's also a lot of sick and cowards that simply harassing and pesting celebrities as well, simply as they trying to archieve popularity as well, the best thing we can do, is simply don't give those shites importance and step over.
|
|
|
Post by Sasha4Jake on Nov 30, 2011 3:33:17 GMT -5
Gyllenhaal and Dust have already a unbalenced relationship, beside the fact of evidence that both were deeply in love. Unfortunately sometimes just being in love is not enought to make it work.
|
|
|
Post by mermon on Nov 30, 2011 10:44:44 GMT -5
Hello! Maria!
- absolutely! I think the same happens with him and Reese. I had the same in my life. Though love was mutual we couldn't be happily together and absolutely were not able to stay friends. Not a chance. I think - the bigger love is, the friendship after breaking up is more unlikely!
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Nov 30, 2011 21:07:09 GMT -5
Hello girls, sometimes i come back like a ghost LOL About Dunst and Gyllenhaal sadly the relationship ends bad, but i've readed that several times both qurelled in LA in public places...an heathed relationship... So i second what you said Sasha love something isn't enought, but Gyllenhaal was very very young at that time, same for Dunst. About Whiterspoon well Mermon even if they were a couple for over 3 years to me she never was deeply in love with Gyllenhaal, i have a negative opinion of her as human being and woman. I'm happy that Gyllenhaal didn't lost his time in trying to build something with her, she didn't deserve it. At least Whiterspoon leave Gyllenhaal just when he've asked to became his wife...she was very very bad...or this was the more relieable rumors about their break-up. My opinion of course. P.S.Sasha did you get mt PM?Just to be sure it didn't get lost somewhere
|
|
|
Post by mermon on Dec 2, 2011 19:11:17 GMT -5
BY the way, it's so strange when one is ready for marriage and the other breaks up from that reason. But maybe it's better to break up before marriage than divorce later. Sometimes a love still exist, but the differences are too big, like religion for example, especially when you raise kids - it's important. Till you just hang out it may be OK. When you start to think about something stable like marriage, the differences are obstacles, then you may have a second thoughts about a sense of being together.
|
|
|
Post by Sasha4Jake on Dec 4, 2011 5:18:26 GMT -5
I agree with you on that, Mermon. I think that's the reason, why people get divorces more frequently today. One is tought to believe the only reason for marrying someone should be love. And I think it's not. It's important to have feeling, yes, but you need to have common goals, morals, etc.. Otherwise you don't have a basis for the years to come.
|
|
|
Post by mermon on Dec 4, 2011 14:55:30 GMT -5
Yes. And in everyday life the base is very important, like a rock you built your family life on it. Just love, without a base is not enough. Though only a base, without love it's not sufficient either.
|
|
|
Post by Sasha4Jake on Dec 5, 2011 2:36:36 GMT -5
Probably not. At least you're not gonna be happy with only one of the two.
|
|