|
Post by eausavage on Aug 4, 2011 18:07:49 GMT -5
In Italy the movie was presented as main actor Paltrow and Hopckins, as Hopckins is wild popular here, so maybe i would have seen anyway.But i love Gyllenhaal performance and how he portray his character, he have just a small part and some scenes but leave a deep mark.Gyllenhaal comes from all the rumors and the fuss about BBM with proof in my country, after just few months than BBM was aired, and for some odd reason most liked much more Gyllenhaal in Proof than BBM... BTW it's an amazing movie, i suggest to spend few hours to watch it!
|
|
|
Post by Sasha4Jake on Aug 5, 2011 2:54:38 GMT -5
Intersting, Maria. Maybe because in Italy (I assume) a lot of people have been raised catholic, so a movie like Proof would not be so controversial like BBM and therefore people would enjoy it differently.
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Aug 6, 2011 19:00:21 GMT -5
No it wasen't for religion, even if seems odd in Italy there not such intolerance for homosexuality, but a thing it's a movie that "shown" explicts scenes and another is know what it means, i guess it's always a bit hard dealing with image, expecially for men... In Italy Proof was well receved ad Hopckins is very very famous, and back in time "Silcence of the Lambs" was a box office far away longer that the movie gotten nominee for the Oscar. Also in my country back in the middle of 90ies asylums was closed off definitely, and this thematic, about mental disease is quite important, and this made "Proof" an hit i guess...
|
|