|
Post by eausavage on Dec 29, 2010 17:44:27 GMT -5
i know that Gyllenhaal refuse avatar, mainly because it's all about special affect, also because the director James Cameron starting to work on the avatar of character based on Gyllenhaal's complexion longer before he was in runoff for the role, sincerely,the plot?Just a sort of Pocahontas in 3d with bluish skin indians.... all the oscar that movie got was just about special effect, nothing such great in the end...predictable movie, i don't mind at all if was a box office, far away worser then POP, Matt Damon as well refuse the role BTW. Titanic was seriously harmuful movie for Leonardo DiCaprio's career, he took a while and has to done an hard work to re-star all over again and build his reputation, after Titanic DiCaprio done only "The Beach" movie, not a good movie indeed. trekfan again clearly i didn't wish to waste my time talk about Ledger, IMO Gyllenhaal wasen't such close to him as sevaral claimed, was at least friendly aquietance between them, i didn't know that any official celebration was in LA for Ledger, the only official funeral organized form his familiy was in Austalia, for few intimates, and Gyellnehaal wasen't among them. I guess that Gyllenhaal is fed up to talks about Ledger, have really a bad mood for all his entire promotion time in Australia,and it's fairly believable that was due to insistance on the press asking about Ledger. Sure Gyllenhaal talked about him in the GQ issue of last spring but it's his common kindly way of doind to reply to every question instead to avoid it, he cannot said something different about a collegue with he've shared a really important artistic experience.Also Gyllenhaal cannot say something different about a collegues that died such tragically so younger, it's obvious that he've felt paint for his loss. So far BBM is important to Gyllenhaal and his career, but i'm sure he'll keep improove himself and get better and better as actor.
|
|
evie
Jake Fan
Posts: 449
|
Post by evie on Dec 29, 2010 19:41:48 GMT -5
How is not important? Those are his words. Jake is a great actor. He gave us great performances in October Sky, Donnie Darko, The Good Girl, Jarhead ... but BBM still remains his best performance for me. Unfortunately I have not seen laod. I want him to give us a bigger permormance than BBM? Sure. This is one of the things I most want to see and obviously he has the potential to do so. He just needs to find the right role. We know that in the film industry they speak of actors having "breakout" roles; that is, parts that showed their talent in a deeper or more thrilling way, drawing critical praise and a much bigger audience. Jack Dawson in Titanic is Leo DiCaprio's breakout role, as is Jack Twist in BBM for Jake. Both films were nominated for Oscars, and any film so nominated puts its stars in the spotlight, which in turn opens doors for them. Without his Titanic success, Leo might never have had the opportunity to star in The Aviator, Gangs of New York, The Departed, Blood Diamond, Shutter Island, or Inception. His major career begins with Titanic. In Jake's case, BBM showcased his amazing talent as an actor, even though it didn't produce quite the same popular frenzy as Titanic did for Leo. Jake got an Oscar nomination out of BBM, and from that he gained prestige and greater recognition. Of course, both actors were known before Titanic/BBM. They did wonderful work leading up to these films (Leo: What's Eating Gilbert Grape, This Boy's Life, Basketball Diaries, Romeo + Juliet, Marvin's Room; Jake: October Sky, Donnie Darko, Good Girl, Moonlight Mile, Proof). Some fans may prefer any of those roles, or others, over the ones in Titanic/BBM. That's a matter of personal taste, and it really can't be argued.
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Dec 29, 2010 20:03:38 GMT -5
Personally i've never argued about BBM,as i've stated that is a very good movie and also that Gyllenhaal have a standing interpretation, i've went also to see in theatre when reach my country, and it's indeed a good movie,personally i'd rather prefer Gyllenhaal in Jarhead, but just taste , my tongue is dry by dint of repeating. BTW Gyllenhaal have critics praise as well for October Sky, Donnie Darko, the Good Girl, so BBM was a the next transition for his career, and get also an Oscar nominee as Lead actor for jarhead too. I don't like to be exploided, and turns in the end that i don't like BBM, simply i think that Gyllenhaal heva a lot of movie to do, and all the chance to emproove his acting, and give us very good performance. It's a fact that DiCaprio have a break in his career after Titanic, but hopefully his talent helped himself to raise up and take his place in Cinema stardust. I just mean that have a good box office, dosen't help that much if you can't manage the success, sadly has been happen to very good actor like Mickey Rourke, Michael Keaton, Robert Downey Jr. I just don't care too much that Gyllenhaal didn't take the role in Avatar, isin't a movie that last beside special effect, as it's all based on this.
|
|
|
Post by monicabbm on Dec 29, 2010 20:14:42 GMT -5
You really do not like Heath Ledger, but that does not mean that Jake feels the same! Where did you read that Jake was upset in Australia because of questions about Heath?
Jake was such a good time there. And in every interview he seemed to enjoy it!
I think you see things that nobody sees.
he cannot said something different about a collegue with he've shared a really important artistic experience.
Really? I do not remember him having spoken "enamorado by him" about other actors with whom he worked!
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Dec 29, 2010 20:36:12 GMT -5
You really do not like Heath Ledger, but that does not mean that Jake feels the same! Where did you read that Jake was upset in Australia because of questions about Heath? Jake was such a good time there. And in every interview he seemed to enjoy it! I think you see things that nobody sees. he cannot said something different about a collegue with he've shared a really important artistic experience.Really? I do not remember him having spoken "enamorado by him" about other actors with whom he worked! well simply we have different impression, in Austarlia he seams tired and really in bad mood, i just look at the pics in photocall session, he seams such bother, surely someone poke him with Ledger stuff, and been nice with interviewer it's part of Gyllenhaal's profession, so he must be kind and try to stay relaxed while he've make some interview. Don't make a personl thing among us as it's not, simply i post my impression. Nobody, so far just Nicholson so far, dare to spoke badly of a young actor died tragically, so it's the less you could expect from Gyllenhaal, that share an important experice with Ledger, filming BBM, is that he praise his collegue, that's all. At least i hope you really dosen't mean that Gyllenhaal have some love affair with Ledger as this would be really really sad, never happens something like this, at least Gyllenhaal had stimated Ledger as actor, that's all. I'm simply just Gylenhaal fan, and i'm fine with that, i really leave all the rest behind,. Then really think what you want i speak too much on this.
|
|
|
Post by monicabbm on Dec 29, 2010 21:00:41 GMT -5
He was probably tired from the trip. It was a very long flight, and in shortly he had to participate in all those interviews. If he was upset with questions about Heath, that probably would have been comented in all sites.
I did not say he had a romance with Heath. He just said he liked him, he admired him. And he used a word significant to demonstrate that admiration.
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Dec 29, 2010 21:13:32 GMT -5
Simply if you wish to express you concept in the most fair way possible and comprehensible as possible, you shall use an english word, as i doubt that Gyllenhaal speak Portugues language, actually "enamorado" means "be in love" I told you that i'm not interested in Ledger as actor, i mean that i focused my attention on Gyllenhaal only.
|
|
|
Post by monicabbm on Dec 29, 2010 21:48:09 GMT -5
I was wrong, in the interview is "enamored by him"!
He said: "I always kind of enamored by him, you know!"
He was sincere saying that sometimes it was hard to sit with him.
I love reading the interviews of Jake. He is so sincere, intelligent, funny ...
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Dec 29, 2010 22:00:06 GMT -5
Monica this is a very hard thing to believe, the meaning is the same "Be in love"... But i don't wish to still debaiting on Ledger.
|
|
|
Post by monicabbm on Dec 29, 2010 22:06:34 GMT -5
Read the interview and you'll understand why he said that. It has nothing to do with being in love. It's just admiration, respect ...
I also do not want to debate with you about Heath Ledger. This is the last.
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Dec 29, 2010 22:10:59 GMT -5
Monica do you referring to GQ inteview? Can you share some link? It's fine do not worry, i'm afraid we're monopolizing the news therad ^.^"
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Dec 30, 2010 8:47:56 GMT -5
found this nice inerview on italian web site about nude scenes in LAOD: During an interview with the charming actor has held: "I wanted to be as credible as possible. I don't know any man who had sex with his panties on,and you? When you see two people in a movie like this who play lovers, as you may think that you love if you do not want to be naked in front of each other? " He continues, joking: "I do not know about you guys, but I never had sex wearing underwear ... So it would be strange in a movie. You can also try but i don't recommend it! It's very important. We know that if we do manage to make people really believe that those two people love each other and are not just two actors telling a story. He continues, joking: "I don't know about you guys, but I never had sex wearing underwear ... So it would be strange in a movie. You can also try but i donit recommend it! It's very important. We know that if we do, we can get people to really believe that those two people love each other, and are not just two actors telling a story " " blog.panorama.it/culturaesocieta/2010/12/21/jake-gyllenhaal-nudo-integrale-per-le-scene-di-sesso-in-amore-e-altre-droghe/
|
|
trekfan
Gyllenhaalic Wannabe
Posts: 522
|
Post by trekfan on Dec 30, 2010 12:46:10 GMT -5
Avatar would have been very very good for his career, something like Titanic for Leo DiCaprio. Leo was a respected actor, but after Titanic he became a world star. I didn't know Jake turned down Avatar, WOW I guess it is one of those decisions he must look back on with some regret (even if it's small) But I am hopeful Source Code might get him noticed. I just wish we knew what he has next up his sleeve
|
|
trekfan
Gyllenhaalic Wannabe
Posts: 522
|
Post by trekfan on Dec 30, 2010 12:47:46 GMT -5
Read the interview and you'll understand why he said that. It has nothing to do with being in love. It's just admiration, respect ... I also do not want to debate with you about Heath Ledger. This is the last. Jake loved Heath, they were very close. He said in an interview he would talk to him about all kinds of things including their work. I bet they talked about things like TDK and POP (I believe Jake probably accepted that role sometime in 2007)
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Dec 30, 2010 13:02:27 GMT -5
Avatar would have been very very good for his career, something like Titanic for Leo DiCaprio. Leo was a respected actor, but after Titanic he became a world star. I didn't know Jake turned down Avatar, WOW I guess it is one of those decisions he must look back on with some regret (even if it's small) But I am hopeful Source Code might get him noticed. I just wish we knew what he has next up his sleeve you'll never know upfront how movie reach audience, at that time Gyllenhaal choose POP, and maybe was the most appropriate decision for him and his carrer in early 2007, i mean nobody could imagine how avatar would granted by audience. At least avatar it's innovative in terms of special effect, but the plot isn't that much original.
|
|