|
Post by Sasha4Jake on Nov 29, 2010 14:51:42 GMT -5
I as a Jake fan couldn't care less wheter his film does well or not, but Jake will (have) to care. A good box office record means higher pay check and more options to choose from. Plus a guy who can get people into theaters on TG and therefore count's as a sure bet is given more opportunities too. And that's pretty much why I care - I want to see Jake in as much well funded films as possible. Otherwise he might end up in another "Nailed" - he did all the work and we never got to see it, right?
|
|
|
Post by book on Nov 29, 2010 17:05:32 GMT -5
just becuase the movie didnt make alot of money doesnt mean jake wont do well everyone including the critics who didnt like the movie praised the acting og jake and anne so i think a good performance goes along way in hollywood
|
|
|
Post by book on Nov 29, 2010 17:07:32 GMT -5
nailed wasnt jakes fault it had to do with the guy who backed the movie
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Nov 29, 2010 17:55:53 GMT -5
I agree at all with you Book!Nailed isn't Gyllenhaal fault, is related to production issue, also MGM has bankruptcy and a lots of movie were deleted or dealyed, good movie like bond 23, the orb and iroman sequel, and all this movie chashed quite a lot on box office.....
Sorry Sasha but box office didn't mean nothing for a good actor, this is realted to way of acting, to stand the role, been credible as character, i don' wish to Gyllenhaal in cheap bad movie, just cause it's supposed to be good box office record.Gyllenhaal could end up in hudge prduction that force him to act as he don't feel confortable, and loosing credibility, i don't wish his talent waste like it was for Matt Damon, a good actor that starts well, and ends up in action movie, or western remake. If Gyllenhaal itself should think in that way, we've never seen him in Brokeback Mountain. We have to look foward then just the time when Gyllenhaal movie are out, or we'll confuse been addicted with been just fans Just my tow nothing personal of course.
|
|
Matt
Jake Fan
Posts: 379
|
Post by Matt on Nov 29, 2010 19:40:44 GMT -5
More (cogent) thoughts: This was just so up my alley it's insane. Sexy, hysterical, heartbreaking...I loved every second. Jake was de-li-ci-ous. To reiterate: Jake was delicious. If I wasn't laughing or crying, I was drooling. Annie made me bawl, and I can totally see her being nominated for Best Actress at the Oscars--especially now that she's apparently hosting with James Franco. In a perfect world (i.e. mine) Jakey would be nominated for Best Actor in a heartbeat, but I feel like the category's just waaay too crowded this year. Anyways, final prognosis: See it, love it, see it again for naked J, rinse, and repeat.
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Nov 29, 2010 19:53:41 GMT -5
gnak gnka i love your review Matt, i guess the audence empathizes a lot with characters!And don't forget the sex/nude scenes! dont ask how i know but i've felt that this year Gyllenhaal missed the oscar nominee, but surely he'll have his chance in future.
|
|
Matt
Jake Fan
Posts: 379
|
Post by Matt on Nov 29, 2010 20:24:34 GMT -5
Oh my lordy, Maria, I'm not one to be like "Those were some hot nude scenes," but...those were some hot nude scenes. I was sweating, that's for sure!
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Nov 29, 2010 20:31:25 GMT -5
Naaa nananana Matt now you'll have to tell us more, you won't get out of this way so easily! I'm not the kind that enjoy a movie unless there's explicts nude/sx scenes but honestly as long as i've seen Gyllenhaal movie i'm used to.....^x^" Maria
|
|
Matt
Jake Fan
Posts: 379
|
Post by Matt on Nov 29, 2010 20:43:06 GMT -5
There's no JG peen (sadly), but there is a whole lotta bootay. And, obviously, that's a wonderful thing in itself.
There's one scene where he and Annie are in bed naked (how shocking!) just talking, she on top of him, and you see his entire side completely exposed and...yeah.
I needed a change of underwear.
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Nov 29, 2010 20:50:26 GMT -5
There's no JG peen (sadly), but there is a whole lotta bootay. And, obviously, that's a wonderful thing in itself. There's one scene where he and Annie are in bed naked (how shocking!) just talking, she on top of him, and you see his entire side completely exposed and...yeah. I needed a change of underwear. I guess it's my fault to pushed you to talk about Matt! well so far just Malkovich, Willis Craig done a entire nude scene frontal, with genitals quite visible, i was sure Gyllenhaal didn't go for such explicts nude scene, but i'm quite pleased he've still such confortable with his own body!Now i'm going to think of you when i'll see that scene too!so we'll have a connection!
|
|
Matt
Jake Fan
Posts: 379
|
Post by Matt on Nov 29, 2010 20:51:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Nov 29, 2010 20:52:47 GMT -5
I love you too!
|
|
|
Post by eausavage on Nov 29, 2010 21:27:44 GMT -5
There's no JG peen (sadly), but there is a whole lotta bootay. And, obviously, that's a wonderful thing in itself Ok i guess i'm shamelessly lucky, i've found a screencap from the movie, whyle i'm looking for the adapted trailer in italian language and i've found one where we can see Gyllenhaal's penis, it's foggy but you can see it clear.... Also the movie will be out in theatre in Italy on 4th of February.
|
|
|
Post by book on Nov 29, 2010 23:25:05 GMT -5
yea i saw that too its been on certain sites but nobody knows for sure if its really jakes penis some think its photo chopped
|
|
|
Post by Sasha4Jake on Nov 30, 2010 3:43:24 GMT -5
@ Matt: thanks for your awesome review. Now I want to see it even more!
|
|